To help you visualize nations usually active in the genetic control of leaf rust resistance, the new QTL-assessment thickness index (Chardon ainsi que al. 200cuatro) was calculated (Fig. step three). This figure expands when you look at the a neighborhood which have (i) the number of QTL of different tests, (ii) this new distance ranging from QTL positions, and you may (iii) the precision of the individual QTL position quote.
Fig. 3. New overview figure are determined the step one centimorgan (cM) and plotted together for each and every chromosome (blue curve). Several horizontal dotted contours could be the average worth of the latest figure (0.055) and also the tolerance having higher opinions (0.275), identified as 5 times the average worth (Chardon et al. 2004). Taverns underneath the assessment curve portray the wheat chromosomes in which QTL was basically estimated. Light gray (green) packets represent meta-QTL harboring at the least dos QTL, whereas dark-gray (red) packets portray novel QTL. Ranks off before mapped Lr family genes during the wheat is depicted by triangles lower than chromosome bars; Lr family genes colocalized that have meta-QTL is actually conveyed inside black gray (blue).
This new overview list is computed most of the centimorgan and prices was gotten for every of the 144 projected QTL (Fig. 3). As a whole, 52 analysis highs was indeed obtained, of which 47 exceeded the common value of new statistic (0.055) along side genome and you will illustrated genomic sensuous places getting leaf corrosion opposition. Of your own 47 peaks, 25 exhibited opinions exceeding new higher-worthy of endurance (0.275) (Fig. 3). Just how many highs surpassing the typical threshold varied from 1 within the chromosome 4A and you will 7A to help you four into the chromosomes 1B, 2D, and you can 7B. With the second, all of the five peaks as well as surpassed the higher-really worth tolerance.
QTL meta-studies.
The new 144 QTL estimated onto the Wheat Chemical 2004 map had been confronted with meta-research by using the qualities of Goffinet and you will Gerber (2000) when the amount of QTL in a beneficial chromosome try lower than ten and those out-of Veyrieras ainsi que al. (2007) when the matter was ten or even more. Pursuing the an enthusiastic AIC, 141 QTL were classified with the forty-eight MQTL (Dining table 2). The program didn’t imagine about three QTL to own meta-research because of their low LOD score opinions otherwise high Si. In every, thirty-five MQTL, comprising 128 QTL, was the consequence of new consolidation of at least 2 QTL, and you may 13 QTL remained as novel QTL (Desk dos).
a for any higher a portion of the desk shows MQTL spanning on least two clustered QTL in addition to bdsm down area reveals QTL leftover given that novel QTL.
c AUDPC = town within the condition progress curve, DS = condition severity, EA = very early aborted territories, EST = situated colonies, Ie = illness show, They = problems types of, LIA = leaf contaminated area, LP = hidden period, LR = leaf resistance, LS = lesion dimensions, LTN = leaf suggestion necrosis, NEC = necrotic territories, SPL = spore development for each lesion, and you can SPS = spore development for each equipment of sporulating structure.
Chromosome | MQTL | Status (cM) | Si (95%) | Flanking indicators | QTL (n) b | Trait c | Opposition origin |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1A | MQTL1 | Xfba254–Xwmc95b | 4 | AUDPC, DS | Apache, Sujata | ||
1B | MQTL2 | step 1.8six | Xcdo98.2–Xmwg837b | 6 | AUDPC, DS, They, LTN | Forno, MG5323, Oberkulmer, Pastor, Sujata | |
MQTL3 | 8.46 | Xbarc81–Xfba294 | 2 | AUDPC, DS | Bainong 64 | ||
MQTL4 | 2.10 | Xfba266c–XksuI27 | 2 | DS | Pastor, Pavon 76 | ||
MQTL5 | 0.28 | XksuI27–Xbarc80 | 2 | AUDPC, DS | Francolin#1 | ||
2A | MQTL6 | cuatro.62 | Xglk554–Xcmwg682b | 2 | AUDPC | Colosseo, Forno | |
2B | MQTL7 | 3.68 | Xgwm55–Xgwm429 | 4 | AUDPC, DS, It | Carberry, Kariega, Avocet S, W-7984 | |
MQTL8 | Xwmc265–Xgwm877.step one | 7 | AUDPC, DS, LP | Apache, Creso | |||
2D | MQTL9 | 9.thirty-two | Xgwm455–Xbcd718 | 3 | AUDPC, DS | Equilibrium, Forno, MN99394-step 1 | |
MQTL10 | 8.forty | Xfba74a–Xgwm30.1 | 3 | AUDPC, DS, LTN | Forno, Pastor | ||
MQTL11 | 4.11 | Xcdo1008–Xksud23a | 6 | AUDPC, DS, SPS | Balance | ||
3A | MQTL12 | six.73 | Xcdo1345–Xgwm2 | 2 | LR, LTN | Forno, Oberkulmer | |
MQTL13 | Xcfa2134–XgbxG242 | 2 | They, LIA | TA4152-60 | |||
MQTL14 | 2.32 | Xmwg570–Xcdo113 | 2 | AUDPC, LIA | Lloyd | ||
3B | MQTL15 | 2.08 | XksuG30a–Xgwm533a | 9 | DS, Ie, It, LIA, LP, SPL | Harmony, Capo, Opata 85 | |
MQTL16 | 0.89 | Xgwm566–Xgwm888.3 | 3 | DS, It, LIA | Francolin#1, TA4152-sixty | ||
4A | MQTL17 | XgbxR247–Xpsr593.dos | 2 | DS, They | Opata 85 | ||
4B | MQTL18 | Xgwm495a–Xcsu25 | 3 | AUDPC, DS | Avocet S, Creso, Forno | ||
MQTL19 | Xgwm131.2–Xmwg11a | 2 | DS, LTN | Carberry, Oberkulmer | |||
4D | MQTL20 | dos.50 | Xbarc98–Xfbb336 | 3 | AUDPC, They, LIA | Sujata, TA4252-sixty | |
MQTL21 | Xcdo1312a–Xfba177b | 4 | AUDPC, DS, LS, SPL | Balance | |||
5B | MQTL22 | cuatro.79 | Xbarc4–Xgwm371 | 2 | AUDPC, DS | Kariega, SHA3/CBRD | |
MQTL23 | 8.83 | Xpsp3065–Xgwm118 | 5 | They, LIA, LTN | Americano 25e, Capo, Carberry, TA4152-sixty | ||
6A | MQTL24 | Xmwg67.1–XksuH4.dos | 6 | AUDPC, DS, LP | Balance | ||
6B | MQTL25 | S25M19_7–Xcdo476.2 | 2 | AUDPC, DS | Bainong 64 | ||
MQTL26 | Gpc-B1–Xwmc388a | 2 | AUDPC, DS | Bainong 65 | |||
MQTL27 | Xgwm133b–Xfbb130 | 2 | DS, They | Pavon 76, TA4152-60 | |||
MQTL28 | six.91 | Xbarc134–Xwmc417b | 2 | AUDPC, DS | Kariega, Pastor | ||
7A | MQTL29 | 4.73 | XWC2028g–P78/M49.cuatro | 5 | AUDPC, DS | Balance | |
7B | MQTL30 | step 3.58 | Xwmc335–Xgwm68.dos | 5 | AUDPC, DS, LIA | Colosseo, Forno, Kariega, SHA3/CBRD | |
MQTL31 | dos.17 | S25M15_19–Xgwm112 | 4 | DS, They, LTN | MG5323, Oberkulmer | ||
MQTL32 | 4.42 | Xwmc273c–Xwmc311 | 4 | AUDPC, DS, LTN | Forno, Oberkulmer, Opata 85, Pastor | ||
MQTL33 | 0.53 | Xgwm577–Xbarc340.2 | 11 | AUDPC, DS, EA, EST, LIA, LP, NEC | Colosseo, Creso, Sujata | ||
7D | MQTL34 | step one.75 | Xbcd1438–Xcnl6b | 3 | AUDPC, DS, LTN | Forno, MN98550-5 | |
MQTL35 | nine.39 | Xgwm44–Xcfa2174c | 2 | DS, LTN | Oberkulmer, Opata 85 | ||
1A | … | 123.5 | Xwmc237–XksuE11.1a | 1 | DS | SHA3/CBRD | |
1B | … | six.13 | XksuF43.1–Xabc155c | 1 | LIA | Capo | |
2A | … | Xfbb329–Xgwm339 | 1 | LP | Creso | ||
… | 3.09 | Xfbb353.2–Xglk554 | 1 | LIA | Colosseo | ||
2B | … | 4.98 | Xwmc344–XksuD22 | 1 | LIA | Capo | |
… | 4.twenty seven | Xfba310.1–Xbcd1231 | 1 | LIA | Capo | ||
2D | … | Xwmc243–Xgwm608.step 3 | 1 | DS | SHA3/CBRD | ||
5A | … | 2.00 | 5.55 | Xcnl6b–Xgwm154a | 1 | LTN | Oberkulmer |
… | Xbcd508–Xfbb255x | 1 | DS | Pastor | |||
… | Xwg114a–P43/M62-5 | 1 | EA | Creso | |||
6A | … | nine.88 | Sr26–P38/M51-cuatro | 1 | LTN | Oberkulmer | |
7D | … | 3.forty-eight | XgbxG564–Yr18 | 1 | DS | Opata 85 | |
… | Xgwm121–Xbarc53 | 1 | LTN | Carberry |