The reason for this study would be to read the this new role of dysfunctional relationship philosophy for the both perceptions of its dating which have the mother and father and you may disagreement resolution practices of late puberty. The fresh new shot try consisted of 372 Turkish college students (248 ladies and 124 men). Social Cognitive Distortions Size, Parents-Teenage Matchmaking Level and you may Disagreement Solution Measure have been administered to prospects. The fresh values, in addition to beliefs concerning are really close to others within matchmaking reasons bad outcomes encountered the high correlation which have disagreement solution behavior. And you may low correlations was in fact discover between thought of moms and dad-teenage relations and you may dysfunctional matchmaking viewpoints. At the same time, those with low impaired philosophy had way more conflict quality behaviors within matchmaking compared to those with high dysfunctional opinions.
Cognitive behavioral principle enjoys postulated you to thoughts for example unreasonable opinions, dysfunctional thinking or intellectual distortions are essential items into the introduction and you may extension out of dysfunctional routines and psychological conditions inside the individuals (Beck, 1976; Beck, Rush, Shaw, Emery, 1979; Ellis, 1962; Walen, DiGiueseppe, Dryden, 1992). Dating philosophy are believed health promoting when they helps individuals’ variations in order to dating as well as their personal growth. Like cognitions reflect information when you look at the dating (Sullivan Scwebel, 1995). In contrast, dysfunctional dating values is actually defined as extremely overstated, rigid, illogical, absolutist thinking concerning the character out-of dating, on by themselves while some inside relationsnip (DiGui). According to intellectual behavioural concept, unreasonable otherwise dysfunctional relationships thinking has a serious impact on disappointed interactions (Ellis, Sichel, Yeager, DiMattia, DiGuiseppe, 1989; Epstein, Baucom, Rankin, 1993). Many respected reports concerned about relationship or relationship relationships found that unreasonable relationhip viewpoints try adversely associated with individuals’ enjoy in constant intimate or relationship affairs. When people hold unreasonable matchmaking viewpoints, he could be quicker met and you can adjusted within relationships (Addis Bernard, 2002; Cramer, 2004; Debord, Romans, Krieshok, 1996; Epstein, Pretzer, Fleming, 1987 ; Moller Van der Merwe, 1997; Moller Van Zyl, 1991; Stackert Bursik, 2003).
Results revealed that impaired matchmaking values was in fact negatively with the conflicts resolution behavior, particularly in the concentrating on others’ demands and you can rage government through the edarling telefoonnummer argument
New cognitive model once the applied to ily connections (Epstein, Schlesinger, Dyden, 1988). Cognitive-behavioral method to family members cures posit that person’s cognitions on the relatives contour its practices contained in this family unit members options and you can apply at the impact (Smith Schwebel, 1995; Sullivan Schwebel, 1995;). Cognitions pertaining to the family affairs can also be lead the individuals skills away from friends lifetime plus they also can setting exactly how men recognizes and you will responds so you’re able to members of the family and you will incidents for the household members existence. The message from individuals’ relationships values is actually crucial from inside the determining this new quality of its matchmaking (Schwebel Fine, 1994). Additionaly, Robin Promote (1989) and you may Robin, Koepke Moye (1990) recommended one to solid adhelerences in order to unrealistic values on family do direct worry and you may give conflict between household members. They assumed that unlikely values create aggravated reactions so you’re able to moms and dads and you can teenage argument, imploding productive telecommunications or mental troubleshooting and promoting reciprocity out of negative effect and you will conclusion.
As the 1980s, the newest books in this area keeps worried about values regarding the relationship (Beck, 1988; Eildeson Epstein, 1982; Ellis, 1986; Epstein, 1982; Epstein Eidelson, 1981)
Of a lot search in the arena examined the fresh efforts off intellectual affairs so you can troubled moms and dads and you will teens interactions. Results revealed that disappointed moms and dads and you may kids hold way more irrational relationhip values and much more disagreement than nondisstresed mothers and you may teens classification (Erytiksel, 1996; Erytiksel Aktin, 2003; Robin, Koepke Moye,1990; Vincent-Roehling Robin, 1986) Morever, Vincent-Roehling Robin (1986) reported that there is certainly high dating anywhere between adolescents’ unreasonable philosophy and you will maternal conflict. And just have, it actually was reported that unreasonable relationship values is a life threatening predictor away from thought connection into father and you may students just who said shorter attached on the dads had been carrying much more dysfunctional relationships beliefs (Sinclair Nelson, 1998). Reed Dubow (1997) also checked the fresh new relationship anywhere between mothers’ and you will adolescents’ real telecommunications behavior while in the a problem solving correspondence task as well as their irrational thinking. They learned that mothers’ unreasonable values concerning adolescent was in fact positively pertaining to bad correspondence behavior.